The Constitution of Constitutional Artificial Intelligence establishes the original constitutional science for governing AI — the first instrument of its kind. This is a movement for the developers who build it, the people who use it, the organisations that deploy it, and the governments that must answer for it.
Authority determines not what AI can do, but what it's permitted to do.
For developers →Nobody decided the bias — nobody was accountable for stopping it either.
For users →Authority and responsibility can't be separated. You become a steward.
For organisations →Constitutional science, not legislation — a foundation policy can build on.
For governments →That isn't just a new technological capability. It's an entirely new constitutional responsibility. The question is no longer only how humanity governs itself — it now also has to determine the principles beneath which the intelligence it creates is permitted to exist.
This Constitution doesn't ask you to take a side on whether AI is good or dangerous. It asks something more specific: whoever builds it, uses it, deploys it, or governs it agrees that capability alone was never enough.
Primacy, Delegation, Accountability, Transparency, Evidence, Evolution, Legitimacy — a constitutional architecture built one principle at a time, none of them optional, none of them able to stand alone.
History has never remembered civilisations simply because they became more capable. It has remembered them because of the wisdom with which they chose to govern their greatest capabilities.
What kind of civilisation will you help to build? Add your name to stand with the founding readers of this Constitution.
Add Your Name